Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
This response is total bullshit. I'm not going play this game of "show me" with you every time. The paper was nearly 100% in the bag for Hillary from the start. You can find endless criticisms of its bias with cites to its slanted articles from a simple google search.
|
You can't find even one article that illustrates your horseshit point. The reason for that is that you are wrong. At least in theory, all you would have to do is find any old WaPo article of election coverage, but we both know it would take you a lot of more work to find something, anything, and that's because it doesn't exist.
I certainly have criticized the WaPo's coverage, op-ed and news alike, and if you were to make some sort of serious point about it, I'd be all ears. But to say that you couldn't tell the difference between the news coverage and the op-ed coverage is ridiculous.
