Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebby
She was smart. You always destroy the paper trail. Even the worst inference against you, or obstruction charge (which alone wouldn't be raised against a candidate for high office), beats getting caught with anything.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Okay, this is the perfect example of the disconnect that seems to exist between your ears. You seem to be completely convinced that Hillary committed a crime and you type something like this to support your inference. Yet, you also seem completely convinced there is nothing there when it comes to the current FBI investigation into collusion between Russian operatives and the Trump campaign/Administration even though almost everyone who works for him had contact with those Russian operatives, he has considerable business relationships with Russians close to Putin, and refuses to say anything negative about Russia.
How do you reconcile these two stances?
|
I don't think I ever got an answer on this. No matter. I'm sure you'll take the latest Manafort revelation in stride. Under the table payments that match the ledger discovered relating to the Ukraine payouts detailing his pro-Russia work don't prove a thing when it comes to collusion. That's true. But let's add this to the amazing amount of contacts, payments, and relationships Trump's people had to Russia.
http://thehill.com/policy/internatio...payouts-report
I'm guessing we can skip over Kushner's failure to disclose dozens of meetings with foreign leaders (including ones with Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the U.S., and Sergey Gorkov, the head of Russia’s state-owned Vnesheconombank) when he applied for top-secret security clearance too?
Let's move on to your Rice garbage. Does the fact that
no one seems to think Rice did anything wrong mean anything to your analysis? The classified docs Nunes was handed by the Administration which he based all of his garbage on contradict his conclusion, Trump's bullshit, and yours, when it comes to Rice.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/11/politi...ims/index.html
I guess you'll avoid saying you were wrong by telling us you need to personally read the classified documents if they're ever released. Maybe something even better?
TM
