Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
No, it's a stupid semantic argument. Whether or not you had an "obligation," whatever you mean by that, you made a choice about how to vote and you didn't vote for her. No one was talking about obligations and duties; they have been talking about the choice you made, and how it looks more and more misguided every day.
|
y'know, people hating on him for the 3rd party vote are implying we have some right to control his vote, or at least to expect him to use it a certain way. That could be read as we are setting an obligation.
The better approach is to remind him of the assumptions he stated when telling us what his vote was going to be.
