Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I don't really want to continue this. I don't disagree with you when it comes to judges who are qualified for the positions they are being nominated for. However, the ABA graded her as unqualified. If she is unqualified, there is only one reason why she is being nominated to the bench and that's her ideology. If she refuses to answer questions about even basic positions she's taken publicly (and I think the headline should have been more about her positions on abortion) and declines to answer questions about where she stands on settled law, then she should be deemed a danger to our system of justice and not allowed anywhere near a bench.
TM
|
I agree with everything you wrote. To me anyone that outspoken on abortion should be DOA for nomination. But that she was even nominated shows how far the senate has likely slipped.
