Forums

[LessinSF]

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield

I used to like the mental games element of the arguments, but honestly, I like arguing with Ty here much more than that. The subject matter is usually way more interesting, and neither of us is going to try to say the other's sur-reply is barred under the rules, collateral estoppel, or in excess of characters allowed.

Being a procedural ninny is fun when you're immature. To the extent I use those tricks to help someone, I feel good about it. But more often than not, I'm working for evil.

It's gotten old -- the whole tearing things down bit.

I wasn't referring to procedural gamesmanship. I was thinking of (since I do insurance coverage) the figuring out the answer - the research in any of the 50 states and applying the facts to the law.