LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 129
0 members and 129 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-15-2018, 02:56 PM   #1239
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Cuckoo Pants

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
This is a phrase that never had a terribly good use anyway but regardless has become entirely useless aside from signalling that the person using it does not care about whatever issue is being discussed.

I don't think you don't care, so maybe it's not the best word choice.

Voting for women and taking a step back sometimes seem like pretty concrete ideas of what's to be done.
The word "virtue-signaling" has many excellent uses. It defines a certain type of self-righteous behavior in which one professes beliefs, judges others for disagreement with those beliefs, but never takes any useful action to help the aggrieved or persecuted people who are the subject of those beliefs. And as Ty noted, usually those beliefs are extreme, which is intentional. If you accuse the signaling person of talking and not actually doing anything, they have the built in excuse that their aims are so radical they cannot be achieved in the current system.

I could be accused of virtue signalling by voting third party. Except that I did intend to contribute to the third party voting numbers. And I didn't judge Hillary or Trump voters for voting as they did. (I suspect the most ardent virtue signalers voted for Jill Stein and told everyone they did so, endlessly... on Facebook.)

Voting for anyone based on anything other than platform and skill is unwise.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 06-15-2018 at 03:04 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.