Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
I agree with Kavanagh. We have abandoned assumption of the risk.
|
We never had it with owners of animals, have we? Don’t they only get one tort-free bite under common law? So why should Sea World (the owners of Shamu) get more free bites than Sebby with his labradoodle? I would totally sue that pompous blowhard if his mutt took a nip at me while he was too busy pontificating over the 37 minute drum solo in his bootleg reel to reel of the Dead’s 1973 Red Rock show to pay attention to the evil little bastard.
And (serious question) has assumption of the risk ever applied in an employment situation?
