Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
My point is that once California gets 10 senate seats they'll all go to liberal dems because LA/SF will outweigh the rest of the state. Last actual senate race the R got 37%* of the vote- can you live with 3.7 of the 10 California senators being R? Rhetorical, I know you wouldn't, but face it, you ain't about making it fair, and representative, you're about making the senate forever liberal.
|
Jesus Christ. You are so full of shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
And what's so special about the California border? Break it in two- Lower and upper. And NY? Make it urbania and Hudsonville- Florida? SouthBeachatopia and RedNeckville. But don't tell me you want all people represented.
|
Even your examples don't achieve what you intend.
As with your bullshit above, I would be all for a system that apportions Senators based on your ridiculous examples. How many Dem senators would NYC get? The rest of the state can split 1 way right Republican.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
*and you had one job- go look at senate election returns and back out the LA area and see what happens to the 63/37 split. Do you so lack intellectual curiosity that you reply to me as if my IQ is in the 90s instead of actually doing the work to have an intelligent discussion?
|
I'm sure you understand that that split benefits Dems more than the current system if you apply it across the board, correct? Maybe not.
TM
