Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
maybe that's a bit broad? e.g. he said this Harris guy wasn't racist but when I asked about what the guy said he didn't argue that it was racist, did he? And having a discussion does mean one can say, "I don't think that is racist," doesn't it?
|
When TM posted the review, I thought "that sounds like conversations we've had over the the years with Sebby." I alluded to, but did not state, that in my response to TM. That was before the Harris/Klein tedium, which is not what I'm referring to.
Of course, I can't recall the precise circumstances I am referring to, aside from pre-election insistence that misogyny was not a significant factor in why people dislike Hillary, that he was well placed to decide that certain grievances made by POC matter and others do not, that racism wasn't a factor in the election outside of ignorant hicks and certainly not among the more affluent GOP voters and, going farther back into undefined history, arguing at times that certain things that were posited to be motivated by racism really weren't.
The person DiAngelo was describing sounded like Sebby to me. But he says he's not, so, okay.