LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,021
0 members and 1,021 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-08-2018, 04:12 PM   #2181
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: We are all Slave now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall View Post
Do we have to test your reading comprehension? Because you just said what I said with different words and thought you were disagreeing.

Either the level of racism rises to a level where you no longer support him or not. If you still support him, then you are okay enough with his racism that it doesn't affect your support of him. You can't have it both ways given the way the sentence is constructed.

TM
You can be very much not okay with his racism, but figure the pluses elsewhere outweigh his racism.

If a man has horrible qualities, you can be entirely opposed to and disgusted by them but decide his other positive qualities render him worthy of support. It’s partly a measurement thing, but it’s also a lot of compartmentalizing.

ETA: You are arguing one has to be okay with something. I’m saying a person can simply ignore it or deem it less material than other issues. “Being okay” with it is not a necessary prerequisite. Aflluent Trump voters apply this analysis. “I hate the guy, but I like the tax break.”
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 08-08-2018 at 04:24 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.