LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 943
0 members and 943 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-10-2018, 12:29 PM   #2265
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: icymi above

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
I thought you were saying it is valid to look at what an oppressed group could/should be doing. Then I said "why?" And explained why it doesn't seem valid to me. Then you agree with me? I am really feeling adrift here.

I need to go back to when stuff made sense.


I. Blame. the. Clintons.
I was confused myself, but happy to see someone kick open the door of focusing on people individually.

The point at issue was whether, if we're assessing people as groups (I don't like doing this, but I'm not fighting the hypo), whether it's acceptable to measure how much a group's disadvantages are its own responsibility versus how much are the responsibility of historical (and if continuing, then continuing as well) discrimination and repression of that group.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.