|
Re: icymi above
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
This is fundamentally correct - Ferguson indeed has found his conservatism can be a substitute for rigor, and he is exactly what I'm talking about in terms of conservatives who maintain a position in academe because schools want a token conservative, despite his work being of poor quality. If Ferguson were moderate or liberal, he would have struggled to get tenure at a modest midwestern school. Just about every notable school has a Ferguson or two they can point to (other than Dartmouth, which buys them wholesale).
|
Ferguson was a full professor at Harvard, and gave that up to join the Hoover Institute, which has a patina of scholarship because of its affiliation with Stanford but is *not* the same thing at all -- it's essentially a conservative-funded think tank. Ferguson did some serious work, and then he abandoned it to do what he's doing now.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|