LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 859
0 members and 859 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-24-2018, 03:10 PM   #2446
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,173
Re: icymi above

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Where do I get the authority to tell Harris who he can have on his show and how he must approach them?
That's the whole fucking point. Neither Klein, nor I, nor you have any such "authority". Which is why our opinion on the matter is in no way censorship.

Quote:
Do you see the authoritarianism there?
No. As I've said a zillion times before, you've got to cut back on your right wing and libertarian media consumption. This is crazy talk

Quote:
That’s the core of political correctness.
The core of political correctness is making an effort to consider how what you say and how you say it affects others.

Quote:
The better approach is to say, “Harris had Murray on, Murray said X, and here’s why Murray’s wrong.”
Why is Harris above criticism? Who gets to decide which parties can be criticized and which can't? Don't you see the authoritarianism in declaring certain parties above criticism?

Quote:
demanding Harris disparage any guest in advance to satisfy the political views of you, me, or anyone else, is a form of preclusion).
Political views? We're talking about whether Harris should present the actual science on the question presented. He should, unless he does not care about misleading his audience. If he does not care about misleading his audience, I hope no one listens to him (and he's no better than Alex Jones).
Adder is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.