Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Sure. And Less was just initially curious about whether Argento was being reasonable.
No it isn't. One can understand that there are reasons behind abuse that involve the abused become abusers. But no one gets a fucking pass. And she is currently not getting a pass.
Absolutely no one is saying that they are the same thing. Are you attempting to set up another straw man conversation?
Ah, yes. The old, "Boys are lucky if hot women statutory rape them" bit.
This needs to stop. We pick an age of consent because we have determined that people under that age do not have the capacity to agree to sex. If you want to argue 17 isn't the right age, okay. But let's move beyond this ridiculous theme that young boys are lucky if they are abused by good looking women. The fact that so many people see it this way makes it almost impossible for them to actually come forward. They may think it was a great thing, but, as I understand it, they often have different feelings about it as they age. I wouldn't be surprised if they weren't often completely screwed up. It's either abuse or it's not. We don't say, "That girl shouldn't complain. The dude who took advantage of her is an athlete!"
TM
|
I should have just given you my proxy.
Nonetheless, can I say one more time about Sebby's post, ewwwwww.
