Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I think there are some crazy people out there who believe an allegation is enough. But those are fringe people. I think rational people are in general agreement that we have to determine if there's heft to this allegation before dinging him. If there is, then we adopt GGG's job interview standard (that a credible accusation backed with compelling facts should be adequate to ding him).
|
Let's be at least a little honest with ourselves. The only thing that is "enough" to ding him when his party is in the majority is that not dinging him is more politically damaging than dinging him.
That certainly correlates with the quantum of evidence against him, but it's not the same thing.
Also, I think we can assume that the GOP believes he did it. If they didn't, they'd be looking for an investigation to show he didn't.
Quote:
|
What happens if the GOP is still in power?
|
That's easy. Nothing.
