Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Full discovery. If this guy wants to be on SCOTUS, all docs have to be released and the other side given all necessary time to examine them.
The GOP's gamesmanship in this regard suggests there's something else here.
|
See, if people want to go full adversarial approach, I'd be fine with setting a higher standard and more due process protections for him.
It's a very different approach than my "job interview" approach, and I still prefer my job interview standard for what this is (and when there were 60 votes needed I think the process more often tended toward that standard, with a couple notable exceptions like Anita Hill), but it's the idea that they want to use a half-ass approach that protects him without subjecting him to the downside of the adversarial process that I object to.
