Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
See, if people want to go full adversarial approach, I'd be fine with setting a higher standard and more due process protections for him.
It's a very different approach than my "job interview" approach, and I still prefer my job interview standard for what this is (and when there were 60 votes needed I think the process more often tended toward that standard, with a couple notable exceptions like Anita Hill), but it's the idea that they want to use a half-ass approach that protects him without subjecting him to the downside of the adversarial process that I object to.
|
I think the docs should be out there in advance in any approach. Even for a mere Senate hearing, all docs conceivably relevant or dredged up in the FBI background check should be made public at least thirty days prior to the hearing. And as new stuff may be uncovered, it should be released within five days of discovery of its existence.
