LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 129
0 members and 129 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-27-2018, 12:32 PM   #3182
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: There but for the grace of etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
It's fun to see you parse and correct someone else's use of language.
I learned from the master?

And at least we argued over an actual word. The biggest problem with "rape culture" is it can mean anything the speaker desires. It sounds really nasty and gets huge effect, but what the fuck does it mean? Does it mean whatever the speaker "feels" it should mean in the moment? Does it mean the seventy year old woman who told me yesterday that these Kavanaugh accusers were paid by Soros is part of "rape culture"? I mean, I was putting her and those like her in the "loony" box all along. Have I been mischaracterizing them? And what's a member of "rape culture" called? A "rape aficionado"? A "rape enthusiast"? "Pro-sexual-assault"? Is there a convention? I don't want to stay at any hotel where that convention's been...

Call these people women haters, misogynists... those fit. And they're pretty sharp indictments. But this all-or-nothing thinking ("if you don't believe her, you're part of rape culture!") and these silly fucking words do no favors for the movement. It's perhaps a sad irony that adults tend to be less interested in radical change than kids, but that change can only be effected when people demanding it converse like adults, but that's the way things work.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 09-27-2018 at 12:42 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.