Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If money goes to someone rich enough that they aren't going to change their consumption, then it does just go into a bank account. I just don't believe there's much difference between union and non-union infrastructure projects in that regard. I am a fan of unions for other reasons, some of which Sebby has pointed to.
|
This is confusing. A union project requires more of the money that is spent go to workers. A non-union job allows that money to be kept by the principals. Unless you're going to start arguing in favor of trickle down theory, how is there not much of a difference?
TM
