Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
This is confusing. A union project requires more of the money that is spent go to workers. A non-union job allows that money to be kept by the principals. Unless you're going to start arguing in favor of trickle down theory, how is there not much of a difference?
TM
|
Trickle down works for the blow dealers, and my impression is people were focused on full employment for drug dealers (but not so much for the low-paid hookers - I think the hookers need a union before dealing with the likes of Slave and Adder).