LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 153
0 members and 153 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-02-2018, 07:45 PM   #3870
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Re: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
I don't think it's undeniable. It's certainly possible and it's been a default assumption for a long time. (Sorta related: https://streets.mn/2016/02/07/no-lar...lue-your-home/ Hank warning: blog post)
That is an interesting blog post and thanks for sharing. The third-to-last paragraph says:

Quote:
It’s probably true that the properties immediately abutting a six-story apartment lose value most of the time, even if new residents or the new building itself brings an amenity to the neighborhood and raises aggregate values. Zoning and small area plans as we’ve conceived them are basically a prisoner’s dilemma response to this reality.
Sounds right. All else equal, the replacement of a single home with multiples residences almost certainly decreases the value of other neighboring homes, in the Econ 101 sense that aggregate demand is unaffected and aggregate supply has increased.

I would rather live in a denser neighborhood, because it will support a greater diversity of stores and restaurants and services. But lots of people in the suburbs really value all those lawns.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 AM.