LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 174
0 members and 174 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-07-2018, 11:49 AM   #11
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Re: God damn it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
There will always be racism during our lives, but I do not think there will always be racism. If the environment doesn't do us in as a species in the meantime, eventually we will become so interconnected globally that both culturally and physically differences underpinning the notion of "race" will fade away.
I've had this conversation a few times in college. While there is an end point on the spectrum of race somewhere in the extremely distant future in which all races will blend into one, bringing it up like it is some sort of solution to racism in the immediate future or even the next 1,000 years, is ridiculous. Hell, even when all the races meld into one on some superficial level there will be other ways to determine lineage and race. Trust me. White people are never letting it go.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Is a tenet of that book's point that all people in this country are racist to some extent? That people start out racist because we live in a system that's racist? Is racism a sort of original sin with which we're all born?
Short answer? Obviously not at birth, but so early on that it is effectively a problem from moment one? Yes.

First let's talk about how she draws the distinctions between race prejudice, racial discrimination, and racism that so few of us acknowledge. We use the term "racism" to cover everything. But really, we should be using the proper terms.
  • Race prejudice is stereotyping and prejudging people based on their race
  • Racial discrimination is an injurious action committed based on race prejudice
  • Racism is the systemic, cultural, institutional structure this country was built on and maintains that favors white people to the detriment of people of color (and black people, historically more than others)
In the book she sites a study performed by Monteiro and others*--and Monteiro discovered racial hostility in white children as young as three years old--that focuses on groups of white children aged 6/7 and 9/10 years old. The groups were separately asked to allocate money to other white and black children sometimes with no adult in the room, sometimes with an adult in the room. The younger group discriminated against black children under both conditions. The older group discriminated only when they were alone, proving that they have been taught not only to discriminate, but to hide their racial discrimination.

I don't want to get into a long discussion about all the factors that we are consistently bombarded with that teach every human being on this planet what the racial hierarchy is and where there place is in it. But what you need to understand is that there is no such thing as "color-blind." And for all effective purposes (since this planet will die long before we get to the "Browning of America" utopia you keep bringing up), there never will be. So arguing that such a standard should be the goal is absolutely pointless and only serves to equip white people with a shield to use now to keep from confronting their own racial issues.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
I ask that because if that's the case, then that same logic would apply to sexism.

And you see how this would preclude, necessarily, an argument that racism or sexism are acts of free will. It would make an argument that the individual is automatically freighted with decisions of the society into which he was born. But if this is the case, I assume one can reject racism and by doing so remove himself from that group indictment. In this regard, racism would still have an intent element to it. Only, rather than intending to engage in it, one is born into it and makes an intentional decision to reject it.
Your argument is flawed from the start. These traits are not innate. They are taught. The fact that you can't see how they are taught from the moment of birth on would be stunning to someone like me if it weren't the norm. White people do their best to resist studying these issues. They push it all off on us as if it's our issue to solve--like it's even possible for us to solve it. I don't have an issue with racism. I suffer from it. White people have the issue and they do not want to admit it, learn about it, or deal with it.

Read the book.

TM

*https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/handle/10071/8425

Last edited by ThurgreedMarshall; 11-07-2018 at 11:54 AM..
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 AM.