LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,036
0 members and 2,036 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-21-2018, 03:31 PM   #4125
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Creepers Prefer Blondes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
The "how bright is the average journalist" thing is just bizarre. The answer is, very bright. I have my complaint about journalists, but it is a hard field to get into and the average journalist reporting at the national level is both wicked smart and has a fancy education.

Fox is often an exception, they have a different set of values that don't put much stock in the high IQ and fancy education in hiring.
They’re bright in a limited regard. If all you’re doing is writing about others doing things, do you really have a complete appreciation of what it’s like to be actually doing the thing you comment about? I don’t think so. Financial journalism exposes the limitations of journalistic “intellect” anew every day.

Pure journalists are indeed very bright and talented, in the skill set of being a journalist. But you wouldn’t invest based on a journalist’s, or pundit’s, assessments. They’ve a somewhat myopic, hammer-on-nails approach to life. Find facts, find insight, cross examine and scrutinize target to get soundbite lengthadmission, ideally salacious.

Cross examining without having to follow the rules of evidence isn’t brain surgery. It might not even be podiatry.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 11-21-2018 at 03:34 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 PM.