Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You should skip CNN and stay with Breitbart, because the idea that noting that Trump's figures are wrong is a brief contact with reality, not a sign of bias. By your way of thinking, the only way not to be biased is to say what Trump wants you to say. Other reporting is biased. What would Christopher Hitchens say? Jesus wept.
|
Hitchens wouldn’t have offered opinion as news. That’s the cardinal sin here that you’ll ignore.
Hitchens would’ve gone straight for the jugular. He’d have come right out on the top of the page, as has his friend Andrew Sullivan, and said, “Here is my opinion... Trump is a lying idiot who should be removed from office.”
When you slide the opinion copy into the factual stories, you’re in Foxland. Again, watch Outfoxed to see how it’s bluntly done.
I assume you’re totally cool with the Times, Journal, and WaPo stuffing Opeds into the news pages? I mean, it’s all just reporting, right? Perception is reality, no?
ETA: Everyone sees what you did there, btw, shifting from acknowledging that CNN claimed Trump “inflated” figures to stating CNN was just commenting on their accuracy. It’s all in the drip, drip, drip... the little digs build a bias among the audience so much more effectively than a blunt Hitchens-like OpEd attack.
“Inflated” is also a great word choice. You picture a fat windbag (reminding you he is one), and recall he inflated his fortune. It’s well chosen. The specific words used are also hugely important, as Trump himself has proven with “low energy Jeb.”
