Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You’ve arbitrarily limited the scope of the drips to one article.
|
No. I've said there is no "drip" in that article. If your flood of media bias is made of that kind of moisture, it is a desert.
Quote:
|
Unless, of course, you suggest that when I said drips, I meant several subtle drips within one article. Or that I was not arguing that these drips are innumerable, and scattered throughout CNN’s reporting, in the majority of its articles.
|
You can't actually identify any of them, but you say there are lots somewhere else.
There is zero anti-Trump bias on display in that article. Instead, you see CNN reporters accepting at face value the White House's claim it is acting in good faith, and only passingly noting the fact that Trump has been lying -- deliberately, according to ABC News today, something you keep ignoring -- for months about the subject. That article is close to stenography. That sort of coverage is what incents the White House to lie, because it works. The idea that it shows bias against Trump is just silly.
