This whole approach should be adopted by the Supreme Court (and yes, I know it won't). But I'm posting the link for this specific finding:
'Eaton ends his opinion by making the subtext of this case explicit. Zullo believes, with good reason, that he was subject to racial profiling, or “implicit discriminatory bias.” Article 11 allows racial minorities to “produce evidence in which a factfinder could find” bias,
even if they cannot prove that the officer himself is a flagrant racist. In other words, cops can no longer pull over black drivers because they’re black, then justify the stop on the basis of some trivial or nonexistent infraction.'
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...marijuana.html
