Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Is he misrepresenting the findings of Mueller, a man he’s known and worked with for 30 years? Are you mad? Do you think these people dont realize they’ll all be subpoenaed before Congress?
|
I think there are underlying factual findings that Barr is attempting to cover up by not releasing this report. Actually, I know there are underlying facts that Barr is attempting to cover up, because a fair number of them have already been reported on.
I do not think Mueller wrote that he did not "find collusion." I think it much more likely that he wrote about the facts and concluded that he could not prove any additional crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. The public should know what those facts are and congress should decide whether they constitute high crimes or misdemeanors.
Quote:
|
But if you were looking closely from the start, instead of buying the media’s bullshit, and the left wing blogosphere’s super-bullshit, you could see there was a lot of hype surrounding some very thin evidence.
|
If you were looking closely form the start, you already know that the campaign chairman, son and other advisors to the president took a meeting with Russian operatives explicitly on the promise of dirt on their opponent. You also know that the campaign chairman shared confidential internal polling data with a Russian operative and lied about doing so. And that said campaign chairman was in hock to Russians with close ties to the Russian government and was working for free.
In other words, if you were looking closely, you should probably believe that it's much more likely that there was some collusion but that witnesses who could prove it declined to cooperate than there was no collusion (in part because we already know there was some).
