Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You can use that argument from both sides. Every new program, including the ACA, costs others elsewhere.
|
Well, yeah. My employees are hurt by ACA, so is my family. But ACA wasn't passed intending to do harm against me. It was intended to help others, and the harm to me was collateral and worth it*.
Your argument might be better directed to pollution control- you can argue more control helps the air, and hurts companies. And vice versa.
But I think adder meant the flat out hate, where the only "benefit" is no fags/immigrants/etc. Not a possibly good benefit that Ty and I might disagree about, but just hate?
*not worth it in my opinion, but in the minds voting for it.
