Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder
No, he did not find evidence that was sufficient to bring a charge. How are you still getting this wrong?
|
"What can asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." - Hitchens' Razor
You are asserting there is evidence adequate to prove criminal conspiracy, but you base this on nothing but your own gut. (Or some silliness about Manafort and Stone keeping quiet.)
I can therefore dismiss that assertion out of hand. You may object to me then making the leap to "there is no evidence of criminal conspiracy," but I'm comfortable doing so. I have the absence of it in Mueller's probe,* and you have nothing but conjecture, or as we describe it when the right wing engages in this sort of thing, "conspiracy theories."
________
* Mueller found facts which Adam Schiff, Bill Barr, and people here would call "collusion." But "collusion" means nothing. Mueller did not find "criminal conspiracy."
