LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,770
0 members and 1,770 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-23-2019, 06:09 PM   #2428
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Re: Franken Revisted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Again, this was a political problem. That's not what the Ethics Committee (especially when it's controlled by the other party) is for.

It may have also been an ethics issue too, but they are separate issues. (Also, it would not shock me if there is no Senate ethics rule against being handsy)
I am not a Senate rules and procedure expert. If you're telling me that it was impossible for Franken to be held accountable for his actions under Senate rules, I do not believe you. Is the Ethics Committee the right body? No clue. Is it the Office of Compliance? The Judiciary Committee? I don't know. But the fact that Franken asked for it to be addressed and the answer wasn't "There is no mechanism," instead of, "Why drag this out, you'll hurt the party?" tells me that they chose not to use whatever mechanism is in place.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 AM.