Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
"or something"
If Schiff responded to those reports in a way that validates them, he outs the whistleblower. They don't know who it is, and he does.
There is no upside for Schiff to talk about the whistleblower's identity. Republicans are doing it as an excuse to talk about something other than what the Administration did.
Not sure why you so credulously repeat conservative talking points.
|
Now RCP is right wing tripe? What isn’t in your world?
There’s huge upside, because if RCP and everyone else driving the narrative are correct about the WB, they’re “owning the space.” Schiff’s going to come out with testimony on the heels of a national “jury pool” already half or more biased against him.
From a PR perspective, this WB can and is being spun as a D operative. People don’t buy anonymous sources. Schiff needs to counter that.
This isn’t a conservative talking point. This is a simple assessment of strategy.
And you need to stop using that cheap comment. I think you think it works. It’s actually boring. If you want to take cheap shots, do something that interests me.
