Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
The sixth sentence neither states the policy nor what violated it. Your point?
|
I had a few. One was that it was hard to tell from your post whether you were under the impression that no investigation had been conducted, or whether you knew that an investigation had been conducted but were making a substantive complaint about what McDonald's did in the guise of a process complaint. Since you were being intentionally or unintentionally obscure, I said, "If you only read....," emphasis on if.
I had other points in the final sentences, the ones you quoted but ignored. I mean, it's pretty clear what the real issue is, but you keeping avoiding it.
