|
Re: Whistling down the alley
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Review, receive, discuss. Look up those words and tell me how the third differs from the other two.
One of the two articles I cited even stated Schiff had advance notice of the accusations in the complaint. In your world, can notice only be provided by document receipt or review? I know you kids hate to use the phone these days, but I believe that, even in your locale, humans still have and occasionally exercise their vocals cords in a thing called speech. Sometimes over the phone app in your “hand computer.”
Find me the cite where the committee says they did not discuss the accusations of the complaint with the WB. Then you might win summary judgment.
|
You are a joke. "There's no affirmative evidence specifically rebutting the stuff I made up that could have happened." You're the one who said there was evidence that Schiff orchestrated the complaint. There isn't. You're still full of shit. You could suggest that the whistleblower is Schiff's long-lost secret child, trying to please him by helping him take Trump down. Find me the cite where the committee says the whistleblower is Schiff's long-lost secret child! Try to move the goalposts however you like -- there still is not a shred of evidence that Schiff orchestrated the complaint.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
