LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,737
0 members and 2,737 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-07-2020, 01:21 PM   #327
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
We should all unite in derision of third party voters.

What total fucking morons.
Are we really doing this again?

You can call them selfish, or privileged, but you can't call all of them morons. You could only call all of them morons if they cared about the things you care about and which anger you about Trump and nevertheless took a risk of enabling Trump to win.

People who have a different laddering of values than you aren't necessarily morons. They are people who do not share your views.

If a third party voter isn't much concerned one way or the other, that person is not a moron. If a third party voter didn't like Trump and voted third party but wound up getting a benefit from Trump's policies, that person is not a moron for voting third party. That person may, however, be dumb for not voting for Trump.

ETA: A Jill Stein voter would be a moron because this person would care deeply about numerous social issues on which Trump is terrible. That I will grant you without qualification. But again, this is not every third party voter. If the result in 2016 didn't matter much in either direction to a voter and the voter voted third party, or just stayed home, that person is not a moron. That person is, again, simply not on the same page as you.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 02-07-2020 at 01:26 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.