Forums

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield

Are you suggesting this judge requesting the unredacted report is proof that Barr misrepresented the report? I'd say that's a judge's opinion.

Now, I know you worship the courts and all, but judges are not infallible. Hence, they have these things called courts of appeal. Perhaps you've experience with them?

You: Barr would never misrepresent the report. He would never risk his credibility just to cover for Trump.

Federal District Court Judge (and Bush-appointee): "The Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report”

“The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary."

You: Ah, whatever, judges are wrong all the time, that's why there are appeals!