|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
I had a judge laugh at opposing counsel today when he argued that there was no need for a preliminary injunction because the parallel unlawful detainer case was proceeding apace and would resolve the issue of what the tenant was doing on the property - the judge said he wasn't sure a UD case would go to (a jury) trial for the rest of this year.
|
This could crush plaintiffs’ firms that don’t have huge reserves. Delay on all files at once = Death. Every defendant will delay like crazy based on inability to do deps, meetings, etc.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
