LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,256
0 members and 3,256 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-10-2020, 04:53 PM   #1161
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,148
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
And what I keep telling you is that it isn’t educated. It’s just a guess.

You still do not understand what evidence means in science.
Adder, Icky's friend was sick, very much so. Icky's friend was given some weird medicine cocktail and got better. Sebby "knows" doctors are giving that same cocktail out and getting results. Icky and sebby might both be wrong as it is not first hand information, but it is "evidence in science."

Science goes like this- see something- friend sick-cocktail makes friend better-

Postulate a theory- cocktail cures sick-

Test theory- this is the hard part- like Ty says most people just get better anyway- and placebo effect and 80 other variables- and there will be no PROOF anytime soon.

But it is evidence (assuming not confused/contrived data points).
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28 AM.