LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 128
0 members and 128 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-11-2020, 10:01 PM   #1186
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
You remember when Sebby was railing against scientifically accurate articles expressing skepticism about an entirely unsubstantiated treatment? Apply that level of vitriol, but this time well-founded against this.

There may well be airborne transmission of this. That other “similar” viruses were transmissible through the air is very weak evidence. It’s a different virus.

It’s different from how four doctors told Sebby that they believe an unproven treatment works, despite a lack of control, but similar. We aren’t going to solve this by intuition.
You realize you’re arguing against continuing a live massive trial which is probably saving lives. What’s you’re argument to a person who’s going on a ventilator and doing badly?

1. Let’s give him the drug and see if it works as it has for others;

Or,

2. No, we can’t give the drug... not enough studies yet.

Stand down. Please. It’s too stupid.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.