LawTalkers
Forums
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 1,433
0 members and 1,433 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread
:
Objectively intelligent.
View Single Post
04-18-2020, 12:50 AM
#
1322
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Adder
You are entirely an illiterate idiot. The packaging is a low-quality transmitter, as I said, because it’s porous. It’s also unlikely to be sneezed or spit upon, because of normal food safety protocols. Also, people accepting it are likely taking greater than normal protocols, including washing their hands. The packaging argument is the same as the food argument, except for heat. The people working there aren’t trying to get you infected, even if they don’t have PTO.
You falsely asserted that people not getting it via obviously low risk means implies that airborne transmission is the primary route, because you have never had any judgment about anything.
Woody Allen has a short story about a chess by mail game gone awry. Both you two should read it.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Hank Chinaski
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
12:32 PM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com