LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 992
0 members and 992 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-09-2020, 12:35 PM   #2054
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
The competition of ideas doesn't work so well when some people in it are more committed to sharing what they think than in entertaining other people's ideas, like when Bennet didn't read Cotton's op-ed before running it or when you posted without reading or responding to what I linked to.
I read the article you cited. Here's the TL;DR for anyone interested:

"I think Cotton's article should not have been given a platform at the Times. We should have people who share my sensibilities limit what gets on the Oped page."

It's just another asshole with an inflated sense of self-enlightenment, and entitlement, declaring himself a brahmin who ought to have editorial powers over the public square. The article offered no insight. I should have gone with "I want my 3 minutes back" rather than treat it seriously.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.