|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Worth reading re Harper's and the public discourse:
This thread is really good
This response [to the Harper's letter, not to the thread above]
Don't know that I am completely agree with the latter, but after reading it I think I understand that much of the reaction to it had to do with the perception that the letter was revisionist history reframing a bunch of other disputes.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
