Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
In other words, Rapoport deserved to be fired for other reasons, and we don't need to discuss his costume at all. So Williamson's choice to include him as an example of cancel culture was intentionally misleading (remember: Williamson cited to that NPR article as his source), an effort to manufacture an example of cancel culture out of a set of facts that suggest something else was going on.
|
I didn’t say he deserved to be fired for other reasons. I said the other reasons are valid bases upon which to ask that he be fired or that he be fired. Whether they were proven or not, or if in reality the photo led to the firing, is unknown.
One would think if the discrimination claims were strong, there’d have been a claim made to the EEOC.
