LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 876
0 members and 876 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-24-2022, 03:20 PM   #677
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: Implanting Bill Gates's Micro-chips In Brains For Over 20 Years!

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Mathematically, the Court isn't in that bad of condition. It just needs a fourth liberal judge and Roberts to play the swing vote.

As to quality/stridency of the ideologues, well, that's different. Alito is a crypto-fascist. Gorsuch seems fine, however. I know little about Kavanaugh, but he is technically qualified. I know nothing about Barrett, but her loony religious views render her unqualified IMO.
It's not really a numbers game anymore. Sure, numbers matter.

But the big problem is that we have some real wackos on the court, people who couldn't give a shit whether their thinking is consistent or provided steady guidance to all the other courts. I think Gorsuch may be the worst of them, but Thomas, Alito and Barrett all given him a run for his money.

I think the jury is still out on Kavanaugh. Sure, he's a creepy guy chock-full of grievances. Sure, his thinking is often reptilian and his training was that of a political hack. But his writing isn't bad and shows some signs of actually trying not to be a hypocrite (Alito is, I am sure, gravely disappointed).

Even if the wackos never make it to a full majority, a court with a bunch of wackos is very dangerous.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 AM.