LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 137
0 members and 137 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-09-2025, 02:45 PM   #2954
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Implanting Bill Gates's Micro-chips In Brains For Over 20 Years!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
And this morning DOJ is threatening criminal prosecution of private companies engaging in DEI...

ETA: The all out assault on "DEI" is pretty astounding. Companies engaged in combination of marketing and typical HR cya are apparently and affront to equality now.
If you are hiring people based on racial/ethnic/sexual identity and not much else, this is problematic. But even then... is it any more problematic than hiring people based on their family connections? I'm having a hard time seeing a difference between hiring people because a company wants to improve the diversity of its workforce (even just as marketing) and hiring nepo babies or Senators' or CEOs' kids who are good for business reasons. Both are strategic choices based on a desire to improve the company.

Seems the govt should stay out of this, as all it can do is sow confusion and create annoying new rules and regulations that will help no one.

Threatening businesses with criminal charges is too ridiculous to dignify with a serious response. I have to put that in the bucket, with so many other recent missives, labeled: Shit Trump Knows He Cannot Do But Suggests to Bully/Troll Opponents.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 AM.