Quote:
Originally posted by evenodds
I agree with BnB's exception to agreeing with Sebbby.
You know from the first time you touch a person if you have chemistry. Sexual intercourse is not required to determine if the chemistry is there.
Still, the pills must erode the social user's already fragile self-confidence. Is the fear that she won't like you if you don't fuck all night? Or that you won't have anything to talk about when it's over? Or is the conquest the only goal?
|
This is a vulgar response, but there's no toher way to answer...
You need intercourse to determine sexual chemistry. There's a certain feeling which is unique to each meaningful sexual experience, and it can't really be determined until you are inside the other person or the other person is inside you (I've no gay male sex experience, but I imagine this translates to gay men as well). Anyway, the experience is a combination of instinctual primordial feelings, hormones, emotions and to a great degree, physical feelings. Some people just don't "fit" well in all these sensate categories. That's why you need the intercourse thing. Its nature's ultimate compatibility test.
Of course, you can have throw away flings where there's no real sensual exchange other than an orgasm and that feels great. You can also have sex with someone for whom you care but realize in the midst of it, "Shit, as much as I like her, this just ain't working."
You gotta fit in many regards, and one of those regards is physical.
