Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Maybe it's soap opera law, but I think annulment on the basis of inability to consumate/frigidity goes out the window if you do consumate. There may be other grounds, like the person was married, is a felon, is drunk, wasn't actually a former member of the mickey mouse club, isn't cool enough to hang with me, and so on.
|
So that's why they had to come up with the lame "not compatible" reasoning. Isn't there a no-fault annulment?
And why not just get the cheapy quicky divorce? Is annulment really more desireable?
