LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,103
0 members and 3,103 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-05-2004, 06:31 PM   #4334
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Not that it hasn't been simply charming...

Quote:
Originally posted by NotFromHere
So that's why they had to come up with the lame "not compatible" reasoning. Isn't there a no-fault annulment?

And why not just get the cheapy quicky divorce? Is annulment really more desireable?
I assume, although citing the inability to consummate might not play well in the sticks.

And, since Brittney's "catholic" perhaps she doesn't want a divorce. Isn't that why Ted Kennedy paid the church to get his first marriage, of many years, annulled?

ETA: Oops. That's Joe Kennedy who did the twelve-years-after annulment.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.