Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
"Certainly there's a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda," he said in 2002. "It doesn't surprise me at all that they would be talking to Al Qaeda, that there would be some Al Qaeda there or that Saddam Hussein might even be, you know, discussing gee, I wonder since I don't have any scuds and since the Americans are coming at me, I wonder if I could take advantage of Al Qaeda? How would I do it? Is it worth the risk? What could they do for me?"
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/12/po...rint&position=
|
When you try your first fraud case on the defense side, you'll be tempted to put on some great evidence of truthfulness that you found in the plaintiff's document production. Resist the temptation. You will realize too late that the evidence you presented actually proves detrimental reliance, which I need not tell you is part of the plaintiff's case in chief and his burden to prove.
