Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
There's nothing damaging in what he says per se. What's damaging is that he is not saying those things now. Clark is like Dean only in the way he has taken a variety of positions on given issues, such that it is difficult to determine exactly what his position is.
|
It's particularly difficult to determine his positions if you read Drudge instead of, say, his full testimony. On foreign policy, the man is incredibly well informed, and has nuanced views. Nuance doesn't come across well on, say, Drudge. It's like you're trying to watch porn for free, and complaining about all the static.
I will admit that he sounds like he's painting by numbers on domestic policy, but I don't think you care because you're only interested in playing gotcha.
And is Bush going to be "damaged" by his flip-flop on nation-building? Yeah, I don't think so either.
