LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 125
0 members and 125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2004, 02:21 PM   #4653
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Yeah, the GOP is all about states' rights in overturning RvW.

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me


I think the areas that those who believe the fetus is a human being have the most difficulty with are in the case of rape and severe birth defects.
First (to save posts), there is a middle ground. What happened to viability? It's as principled as conception or birth for a bright line.

Second, why does conception by rape make the fetus (once born) any less human (or less human, or fetal, before being born)? For birth defects, sure, one could argue isn't viable anyway. The difficulty comes in denying either as a justification. Again, it's where you draw the line. One can say no abortion at all; others can say no abortion as a form of birth control. Well, then abortions after rape are okay.

So what's the point of all this arguing? (late the game).
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 PM.